Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr. B.b.na...

Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr. B.b.naik For Mr Manish R Bhatt For

High Court 02 May 1998 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr. B.b.naik For Mr Manish R Bhatt For
Date of order
02 May 1998
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr. B.b.naik For Mr Manish R Bhatt For, the High Court (1998) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus S G JHALA -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: Mr.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 376 of 1983 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus S G JHALA -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: Mr. B.B.Naik for MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner Mr. Manish Shah for Mr. J.P. Shah for the Respondent -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH Date of decision: 02/05/98 ORAL JUDGEMENT ��(Per R.K.Abichandani,J) ��The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has referred the following question for the opinion of this Court under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in coming to the conclusion that the charging of interest at the lower rate than the market rate by an employer is not a perquisite in terms of section 17(2)(iii)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ?" 2.��Similar question was referred in ITR No. 358 of 1983 and by our judgment dated 1.5.1998, we have held that charging of interest at lower rate than the market rate by an employer was not a perquisite in terms of section 17(2)(iii)(c) of the Act. For the same reasons as we have given in that decision, we answser the question referred in this Reference in the affirmative against the revenue and in favour of the assessee. The Reference stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. ���**** ***darji
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan