Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mrs. Gita...

Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mrs. Gita A. Mirchandani

High Court 13 Jan 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mrs. Gita A. Mirchandani
Date of order
13 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mrs. Gita A. Mirchandani, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.589 OF 2005 Commissioner of Income Tax....Appellant Vs. Mrs. Gita A. Mirchandani ....Respondent Mr. P.S. Sahadevan with Ms.Anamica Malhotra, for the Appellant. Mr. S.S. Shetty for the Respondent. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 13th January, 2009 CORAM: F.I. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATED: 13th January, 2009 P.C.: P.C.: . In so far as Questions (A) and (B) are concerned, the same would not amount to substantial question of law as the issue is based on facts. Both the C.I.T. (Appeals) and I.T.A.T. have held in favour of the assessee-respondent. Consequently the said Questions would not arise. 2. In so far as Question (C) is concerned, the same has been remanded back to the A.O. Even otherwise the issue would be covered by the order of this Court in Commissioner of Income-tax vs. Commissioner of Income-tax vs. J.K.Investors(Bombay) Ltd., 248 ITR 224. J.K.Investors(Bombay) Ltd., 248 ITR 224. Considering the above, Appeal dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan