Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Dayal...

Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Dayal Maghji & Co

High Court 04 Mar 2015 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

04 Mar 2015

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Dayal Maghji & Co, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

AAJé—lgag' / 1 IN THFHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHRH ASPIIR DIVISION BENCHHON'RI F MR T PSHARMAR.HON'BLE MR. LS. UBOWEJA, JJ Applicant M.C.C.No. 643 of 2013 Commissioner of Income Tax Versus Respondent M/s Dayal Maghji & Co. x.» »Appear"ance. Ms. Nausinha Afrin Ali, counsel for the applicant. T PSHARMA.I o RD E R‘V,(04.03.2015) 1.This is petition fOrErestoration of I.T,A‘No.58/2002, dismissed as barred‘by limitation vide order dated 13.08.2009. 2.Learned cou\for-the applicant seeks to withdraw this petitionwith liberty to fileafresh in the light of amendment in Finance Actafter passing ofthis order.with liberty to fileafresh in the light of amendment in Finance Actafter passing ofthis order. 3.Asprayed,thepetitionisdismissedaswithdrawnreservingliberty.‘to file afresh in the light of amended law.liberty.‘to file afresh in the light of amended law. 4.No order as to costs. x Sd/- Sd/—T.P. SharmaJudgeJudge I.S.UBOWEJAJudgeJudge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.