In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S D.n.memorial Trust, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Suraj Singh Advocate. i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc.: ii) Whether approved for publication in press: Yes/No RESIT No.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIRAT JAMMU
RESIT No. 3/2018 in ITA No. 31/2014
Date of order: 16.11.2018
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/S D.N.Memorial Trust
\
Coram:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN, JUDGE
Appearance:
For the petitioner/appellant(s) :Mrs Aruna Thakur Advocate. For the Respondent(s) :Mr. Subash Dutta Advocate with Mr. Suraj Singh Advocate. i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc.: ii) Whether approved for publication in press: Yes/No RESIT No. 3/2018
For the reasons stated in the application and there being no objection from
the other side, the application for restoration of ITA No. 31/2014 is allowed. Consequently, ITA No. 31/2014 is restored to its original number.
Application is disposed of accordingly.
List ITA No. 31/2014 on 17[th] December, 2018.
Jammu 16.11.2018 Sanjeev
(Tashi Rabstan) (Gita Mittal) Judge Chief Justice
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue