Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Five Star Holidays P.ltd
High Court
18 Jan 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Five Star Holidays P.ltd
Date of order
18 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Five Star Holidays P.ltd, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Issue: JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R D E R% 18.01.2018 This appeal was admitted for hearing on the following substantial question of law:- “Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in deleting the addition of 8854 UK pounds (equivalent to Rs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~37
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 721/2005
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Ajit Sharma, Jr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Ashish Jain, Advocate.
versus
M/S FIVE STAR HOLIDAYS P.LTD. ..... Respondents Through Nemo.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
O R D E R% 18.01.2018
This appeal was admitted for hearing on the following substantial question of law:-
“Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in deleting the addition of 8854 UK pounds (equivalent to Rs. 5,26,000/-) made by the Assessing Officer on the ground that it was covered by the undisclosed income of the Assessee on account of telescoping?”
Counsel for the appellant-Revenue accepts that the tax effect is less than Rs.20 lacs.
In these circumstances, we are not inclined to answer the question of law on merits.
For the purpose of record, the appeal would be treated as disposed of.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
JANUARY 18, 2018 MR/NA
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.