Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Franciscan Claris Society
High Court
22 Jul 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Franciscan Claris Society
Date of order
22 Jul 2014
Assessment year(s)
2004-2005, 2003-2004
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Franciscan Claris Society, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal stands dismissed, on the terms thereof.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s Franciscan Claris Society
22.07.2014.
Shri Sanjay Lal for the appellant.
Shri Abhijit Shrivastava for the respondent.
They are heard on the question of admission.
Identical question as has been posed in this appeal under section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, pertaining to the respondent assessee for the assessment year 2004-2005, has already been considered and decided by a Bench of this Court in I.T.A. No. 7/2010 (Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s Franciscan Clarist Society, Bhopal), vide order-dated 27.3.2014.
Except for the fact that the present appeal is for the assessment year 2003-2004, there is no difference in the matter, which has already been decided by this Court as indicated hereinabove.
Accordingly, for the grounds and reasons already indicated by this Court on 27.3.2014, in I.T.A. No. 7/2010, we see no reason to interfere into the matter by taking a different view.
The appeal stands dismissed, on the terms thereof.
(RAJENDRA MENON) (ALOK VERMA)
J U D G E J U D G E
Aks/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue