Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Frosta...

Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Frostair P.ltd

High Court 24 Aug 2012 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

24 Aug 2012

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Frostair P.ltd, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The present appeal is allowed in view of the separate judgment passed today i.e.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON: 01.08.2012 PRONOUNCED ON: 24.08.2012 + ITA 1638/2006 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus M/S FROSTAIR P.LTD ..... Respondent Through: Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Ms. Rani Kiyala and Mr. Piyush Singh, Advocates. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The present appeal is allowed in view of the separate judgment passed today i.e. 24.08.2012 in ITA No. 183/2002 titled CIT-IV Vs. M/s Frostair P. Ltd. S. RAVINDRA BHAT (JUDGE) AUGUST 24, 2012 R.V. EASWAR (JUDGE)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.