Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Himalayan Vegefruit Ltd
High Court
11 Nov 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Himalayan Vegefruit Ltd
Date of order
11 Nov 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Himalayan Vegefruit Ltd, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Decision: In the circumstances, this appeal is disposed of on the same terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
ITA No. 63 of 2008.
Decided on: November 11, 2013.
Commissioner of Income Tax
……Appellant.
Versus
M/S Himalayan Vegefruit Ltd.,
…….Respondent.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice A. M. Khanwilkar, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?
For the appellant:Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate, with Ms. Vandna Kuthiala, Advocate.
For the respondent:Mr. Goverdhan Sharma, Advocate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Justice A. M. Khanwilkar, C.J. (Oral)
It is agreed that the substantial questions of law, on which the present appeal has been admitted has been directly answered in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax versus M/S Gheria Oil Gramudyag Workers Welfare Association, Khanpur in ITA No. 63 of 2007, decided on 19[th]October, 2009. In the circumstances, this appeal is disposed of on the same
terms.
( A. M. Khanwilkar), Chief Justice.
November 11, 2013, (karan/sl)
(Kuldip Singh), Judge.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue