Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Hindustan Films, Bombay
High Court
25 Aug 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Hindustan Films, Bombay
Date of order
25 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Hindustan Films, Bombay, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
Income Tax Reference No. 165 of 1998
Commissioner of Income Tax ..Applicant
vs.
M/s Hindustan Films, Bombay ..Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for applicant.
None for respondent.
CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ. 25th August, 2008
CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ.
25th August, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard Mr.Sahadevan for the applicant.
2. We have perused our earlier order dated 11th October,
2005 wherein we have categorically mentioned that by way
of last chance the revenue was permitted to serve the
respondent by registered post A.D. within two weeks from
today and file affidavit of service within 3 days
thereafter, failing which reference would be returned
unanswered. Again the matter appeared on 4th August, 2008
and once again we granted 3 weeks time to the applicant to
file vakalatnama and serve the respaondent. Even till
date the respondent has not been served. Mr.Sahadevan has
not been able to point out as to what steps were taken to
serve the respondents. Under these circumstances the
reference is returned back unanswered.
-2-
(Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA J.)(Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA J.)
(Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.