Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Ind. Sphinx Precision Ltd
High Court
23 Mar 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Ind. Sphinx Precision Ltd
Date of order
23 Mar 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Ind. Sphinx Precision Ltd, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge.Whether approved for reporting?[1] For the Petitioner:- Mr.
Decision: In view of this, the present appeal stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA ITA No. 41 of 2008. Decided on: 23.03.2013
Commissioner of Income Tax.
...........Appellant.
Versus
M/s Ind. Sphinx Precision Ltd.
…Respondent.
___________________________________________________________
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B.Misra, Acting Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge.Whether approved for reporting?[1]
For the Petitioner:-
Mr. Vinay Khutiala, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Diwan Singh Negi, Advocate.
For respondents: Mr. M.M. Khanna, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Goverdhan Sharma, Advocate.
ORDER
As jointly submit by the learned counsel
for the parties, that the present lis is covered by the judgment of this Court, rendered in ITA No.2 of 2008
and connected matters, decided on 13.01.2012. In view of this, the present appeal stands disposed of.
(Justice R.B.Misra)
Acting Chief Justice
March 23[rd], 2013 (kck/Purohit)
(Justice Rajiv Sharma) Judge
Whether the reporters of the local papers maybe allowed to see the judgment?
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue