Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Jai Mata Glass Ltd

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA ITA Nos. 16 of 2007, 47 of 2008, 50 of2009, 37 of 2010, 1 and 2 of 2013 Date of decision: 15.3.2016 1. ITA No. 16 of 2007 Commissioner of Income Tax …Appellant Versus M/s Jai Mata Glass Ltd. …Respondent 2. ITA No. 47 of 2008 Commissioner of Income Tax …Appellant Versus Sh. Sanjay Aggarwal. …Respondent 3. ITA No. 50 of 2009 Commissioner of Income Tax …Appellant Versus M/s Shiva Exports, Parwanoo. …Respondent 4. ITA No. 37 of 2010 Commissioner of Income Tax …Appellant Versus M/s Navkar Polyplast Company. …Respondent 5. ITA No. 1 of 2013 Commissioner of Income Tax …Appellant Versus M/s Shiva Exports, Sec.-2, Parwanoo. …Respondent 6. ITA No. 2 of 2013 Commissioner of Income Tax …Appellant Versus M/s Shiva Exports, Sec.-2, Parwanoo. …Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?[1] For the Appellant(s): For the Respondent(s): Mr.Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate, with Ms.Vandana Kuthiala, Advocate.with Ms.Vandana Kuthiala, Advocate. Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr.Vishal Mohan, Mr.Rahul Mahajan, Mr. Goverdhan Sharma and Mr.Sanjeev Sood, Advocates. Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice (Oral) Pursuant to circular No. 21/2015 issued vide F.No. 279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ(Pt) by Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes dated 10.12.2015, an office order dated 4[th]January, 2016 stands issued by the Registrar (Judicial & JB) of this Court to the following effect: “Hon’ble the Chief Justice has been pleased to order in pursuance of circular No. 21/2015 issued vide F.No. 279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ(Pt) by Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes dated 10.12.2015 as under: “(1) It is to be specifically mentioned by the Income Tax Department while filing the appeal in the High Court that the tax effect exceeds `20,00,000/- except in the following matters: Department while filing the appeal in the High Court that the tax effect exceeds `20,00,000/- except in the following matters: (a) Where the Constitutional validity of the provisions of an Act or Rule are under challenge, or (b) Where Board’s order, Notification, Instruction or Circular has been held to be illegal or ultra vires, or (c) Where Revenue Audit objection in the case has been accepted by the Department, or (d) Where the additional relates to undisclosed foreign assets/bank accounts. 2. The pending appeals where the tax effect does not exceed `20,00,000/- are directed to be withdrawn/not pressed.” 2. 2. It is not in dispute that the total tax factor is less than `20,00,000/- in each of these appeals and that they do not fall within anyone of the exceptions. As such, present appeals stand disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Mansoor Ahmad Mir) Chief Justice 15[th] March, 2016 (Tilak/KRS) (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge