Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Mathur...

Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Mathura Dass Ved Kaur Memorial Education Society

High Court 08 Nov 2010 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Mathura Dass Ved Kaur Memorial Education Society
Date of order
08 Nov 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Mathura Dass Ved Kaur Memorial Education Society, the High Court (2010) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH. I.T.A. No.493 of 2010 Date of decision: 8.11.2010 Commissioner of Income Tax. -----Appellant. Vs. M/s Mathura Dass Ved Kaur Memorial Education Society. -----Respondent. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOELHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL Present:-Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Standing Counselfor the revenue. --- ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred by the revenue underSection 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, “the Act”)against the order dated 16.7.2009 in I.T.A. No.3683/Del/2008passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi,proposing to raise following substantial question of law:- “Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of thecase, the learned ITAT was right in law in upholdingthe order of the learned CIT(A) in allowing the claim ofdepreciation of Rs.20,63,423/- even when thededuction u/s 11 was already allowed in respect of thesame asset, which amounts to double deduction andis contrary to the decision of the Hon’ble SupremeCourt in the case of Escorts Limited and others vsUnion of India and others 199 ITR 43?” Learned counsel for the revenue fairly states that thematter is covered against the revenue by order of this Court dated10.8.2010 in I.T.A. No.346 of 2008 CITv. M/s Desh Bhagat Memorial Education Trust. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) JUDGE November 08, 2010ashwani ( AJAY KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan