Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Moser...

Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Moser Baer India Ltd

High Court 02 Jan 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Moser Baer India Ltd
Date of order
02 Jan 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Moser Baer India Ltd, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: For the above reasons, the appeal cannot be maintained and is, therefore, dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~R-14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 499/2004 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Dileep Shivpuri, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocate. versus M/S MOSER BAER INDIA LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Kavita Jha with Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocates. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI % O R D E R02.01.2017 It is pointed out that one of us (Najmi Waziri, J.) has about 15 years ago, dealt with the matters pertaining to the assessee in the present case, even though he had no occasion to deal with this particular case. Counsel for the parties, however, submitted that there is no objection to the Bench proceeding to deal with the matter on merits. The question of law framed in this case is as to the assessee’s entitlement to deduction under Section 80HHC without taking into account the brought forward loss. At the outset we notice that the amount in question is `35,96,400/- of which the tax effect would be 1/3[rd] i.e. in the range of about `12 lakhs. The appeal, therefore, cannot be prosecuted by the Revenue by virtue of clause 10 of the Circular no.21/15 which stipulated limits within which the appeal could be filed and pursued by the Revenue. For the above reasons, the appeal cannot be maintained and is, therefore, dismissed. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J JANUARY 02, 2017 /vikas/ NAJMI WAZIRI, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan