Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Nitco Tiles Ltd
High Court
28 Feb 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Nitco Tiles Ltd
Date of order
28 Feb 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Nitco Tiles Ltd, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.795 OF 2011INREVIEW PETITION (LODG.) NO.154 OF 2010ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3713 OF 2009
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.794 OF 2011INREVIEW PETITION (LODG.) NO.155 OF 2010ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3839 OF 2009
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.797 OF 2011INREVIEW PETITION (LODG.) NO.157 OF 2010ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3661 OF 2009
Commissioner of Income TaxversusM/s. Nitco Tiles Ltd.
..Review Petitioner.
..Respondent.
.....
Mr. Arvind D. Pinto with Ms. Padma Divakar for the Review Petitioner.Ms. Beena Pillai, i/b Mr. Niraj Punamiya for the Respondent.
.....
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, ANDJ. P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
28 February 2013.
P.C. :
There is a delay of 66 days in filing the Review Petitions. The delay has been satisfactorily explained and hence the Notices of Motion are made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue