Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Shivalik Hatcheries (P) Ltd
High Court
04 Aug 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Shivalik Hatcheries (P) Ltd
Date of order
04 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Shivalik Hatcheries (P) Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Income-tax Appeal No. 2 of 2001
Date of decision: 4.8.2008
Commissioner of Income-tax
Petitioner.
Versus
M/s Shivalik Hatcheries (P) Ltd.
Respondent.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Deepak Gupta, J.
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K.Ahuja, J.
Whether approved for reporting? No.
For the petitioner:
Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Advocate.
For the respondent: Mr. Lovnesh Kanwar, Advocate.
Per Deepak Gupta, J.
This appeal has been admitted on the following
questions of law:-
1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding the poultry sheds and water lines for sheds as ‘plant’ for the purposes of depreciation allowance and investment allowance under the Income-tax Act? of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding the poultry sheds and water lines for sheds as ‘plant’ for the purposes of depreciation allowance and investment allowance under the Income-tax Act?
2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in allowing extra shift allowance on poultry sheds, fencing, water tanks and well? circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in allowing extra shift allowance on poultry sheds, fencing, water tanks and well?
Identical questions of law arising between the same
parties but in respect of different assessment years have been decided in favour of the assessee and against the
revenue vide our detailed judgement dated 24[th] June, 2008 delivered in ITR No. 6 of 1996. Parties agree that the aforesaid judgement is squarely applicable to this case also.
Consequently, without giving any detailed reasons, but following the judgement delivered in ITR No. 6 of 1996 decided on 24[th] June, 2008, both the questions are decided against the revenue and in favour of the assessee. The appeal is dismissed.
( Deepak Gupta ), J.
4[th] August, 2008 ™
( V.K.Ahuja ), J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.