Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Sikkim...

Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Sikkim Janseva Pratisthan

High Court 02 Aug 2018 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

02 Aug 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Sikkim Janseva Pratisthan, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In view of the statement and having ITA 529/2005 & ITA 534/2005 page 1 of 2 regard to the terms of CBDT Circular, the appeals are dismissed as not maintainable.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~11,12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 529/2005, CM APPL. 9853/2005 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus M/S SIKKIM JANSEVA PRATISTHAN ..... Respondent + ITA 534/2005 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III ..... Appellant versus M/S SIKKIM JANSEVA PRATISTHAN ..... Respondent Present: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Mr. Asheesh Jain, Standing Counsel for appellant. Mr. Jehangir Mistri, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Vasantiben Patel, Mr. Shailendra Swarup, Ms. Aparajita Swarup, Ms. Bindu Saxena, Advs. for respondent. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R% 02.08.2018 It is stated by counsel for the Revenue that these two appeals are covered in terms of the latest circular of the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) (circular No.3/2018 dated 11.07.2018). The tax effect in respect of the relevant assessment years is much below the prescribed amounts (`50 lacs). In view of the statement and having ITA 529/2005 & ITA 534/2005 page 1 of 2 regard to the terms of CBDT Circular, the appeals are dismissed as not maintainable. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J AUGUST 02, 2018 A. K. CHAWLA, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.