Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Tarun...

Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Tarun Industries

High Court 28 Mar 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Tarun Industries
Date of order
28 Mar 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Tarun Industries, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Decision: As such, the present appeal stands disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA ITA No. 33 of 2009 Date of decision: 28.03.2016 Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant Versus M/s Tarun Industries . Respondent Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge Whether approved for reporting? For the appellant: Mr. Vinay Mehta, Advocate vice Ms. Vandana Kuthiala, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Amit Singh Chandel, Advocate. ________________________________________________________________________________ Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice (oral) Pursuant to circular No. 21/2015 issued vide F.No. 279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ(Pt) by Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes dated 10.12.2015, an office order dated 4[th] January, 2016 stands issued by the Registrar (Judicial & JB) of this Court to the following effect: “Hon’ble the Chief Justice has been pleased to order in pursuance of circular No. 21/2015 issued vide F.No. 279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ(Pt) by Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes dated 10.12.2015 as under: “(1) It is to be specifically mentioned by the Income Tax Department while filing the appeal in the High Court that the tax effect exceeds Rs.20,00,000/- except in the following matters: (a) Where the Constitutional validity of the provisions of an Act or Rule are under challenge, or (b) Where Board’s order, Notification, Instruction or Circular has been held to be illegal or ultra vires, or (c) Where Revenue Audit objection in the case has been accepted by the Department, or (d) Where the additional relates to undisclosed foreign assets/bank accounts. foreign assets/bank accounts. 2. The pending appeals where the tax effect does not exceed Rs.20,00,000/- are directed to be withdrawn/not pressed.” 2. It is not in dispute that the total tax factor is less than Rs.20,00,000/- in this appeal and the same does not fall within anyone of the exceptions. As such, the present appeal stands disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ( Mansoor Ahmad Mir ) Chief Justice March 28, 2016 (rajni/vt) ( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) Judge Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan