Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.accurate Minerals
High Court
14 Dec 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.accurate Minerals
Date of order
14 Dec 2009
Assessment year(s)
2001-02, 2000-01
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.accurate Minerals, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, the appeal stands dismissed for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1937 OF 2009
Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.
M/s.Accurate Minerals
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.K.R.Choudhari for appellant.
Mr.I.P.D’Cruz for respondent.
P.C.
1.Heard.Perused appeal.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 14TH DECEMBER,2009
DATE :
2.The impugned order passed by the Tribunal relates to two A.Ys. i.e. 2001-02 and 2002-03. The appeal for the A.Y.2001-02 has already been dismissed. Similarly, the appeal for A.Y.2000-01 is also dismissed by the order dated 8[th] September, 2008. The present appeal involves an identical question. In this view of the matter, we have no option but to dismiss the same. Hence, the appeal stands dismissed for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue