Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.akai I...

Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.akai Impex Ltd

High Court 15 Apr 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.akai Impex Ltd
Date of order
15 Apr 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.akai Impex Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is, therefore, devoid of any merits and is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 6645 OF 2010 Commissioner of Income Tax … Appellant v/s M/s.Akai Impex Ltd. … Respondent Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant. CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & G.S. KULKARNI, JJ. DATED : 15TH APRIL, 2014 P. C. : 1After having heard Mr.Suresh Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and perusing with his assistance the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which is impugned in this appeal and particularly paragraph 5 thereof, we are of the opinion that the question of law raised before us cannot be termed as a substantial question of law, simply because the point is covered by the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the ratio of which has been applied by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to the facts and circumstances of the present case. In such circumstances, the only question raised before us cannot be termed as a substantial question of law. The appeal is, therefore, devoid of any merits and is dismissed. (G.S. KULKARNI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan