Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.brite Automotive Plastics Ltd
High Court
09 Feb 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.brite Automotive Plastics Ltd
Date of order
09 Feb 2009
Assessment year(s)
1992-93
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.brite Automotive Plastics Ltd, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1375 of 2008
Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Brite Automotive Plastics Ltd..Respondent
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.
Mr. Jignesh Shah with Mr. Prem C. Tripathi, for the
respondent.
CORAM: F.I.
R.S.MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: 9th February, 2009
P.C.:
P.C.:
. In so far as Question (a) is concerned, we
find that for the assessment years 1993-94 and
1996-97 the questions have been held in favour of
the assessee and against the Revenue. The same has
not been challenged by the Revenue. Therefore, the
Revenue has accepted the issue for the assessment
year 1993-94 and 1996-97. Therefore, the question
(a) as framed would not arise.
2. In so far as question (b) is concerned the
same was in issue for the assessment year 1992-93.
The Revenue has not challenged the finding in favour
of the assessee. Having accepted the same the said
question, therefore,would not arise.
3. In so far as Questions (c) and (d) are
(-2-)
concerned, the amount involved is less than Rs.4.00
lacs. Even otherwise the amounts have been paid
within the grace period. Hence the questions as
framed would not arise.
. Appeal disposed of accordingly.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.