Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S.carlton Properties Pvt.ltd
High Court
20 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S.carlton Properties Pvt.ltd
Date of order
20 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S.carlton Properties Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1901 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.512 OF 2007
Commissioner of Income-tax- ..Appellant
Versus
M/s.Carlton Properties Pvt.Ltd., ..Respondent
----
Mr.S.M.Shah with Mr.Sandip Wasnik & Mr.P.S.Sahadevan
for the appellant.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello &
R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 20.02.2008
PC
1. This is a motion for condoning 447 days delay in
filing of the main appeal. On perusal of the
affidavit-in-support, we find that the Chief
Commissioner of Income-tax granted his approval for
filing appeal on 6.12.2005. The appeal however,
came to be lodged in this Court on 2.3.2007. No
dates have been given in respect of the events which
occurred between 6.12.2005 and 2.3.2007. In our
view, cause shown does not amount to sufficient
cause. Hence motion dismissed.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.512 OF 2007
. As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed,
appeal also stands dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue