Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S.crown...

Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S.crown Products -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance

High Court 22 Dec 1997 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S.crown Products -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance
Date of order
22 Dec 1997
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S.crown Products -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance, the High Court (1997) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus M/S.CROWN PRODUCTS -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MIHIR JOSHI for Petitioner MR NR DIVETIA for Respondent...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX APPLICATION No 79 of 1997 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus M/S.CROWN PRODUCTS -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MIHIR JOSHI for Petitioner MR NR DIVETIA for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE Date of decision: 22/12/97 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per R.K.Abichandani,J.) �Heard both the sides. The following question of law arises for our opinion:- "Whether, the appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in confirming the order made by the CIT (A) allowing the assessee's claim for depreciation and investment allowance at the higher rate on proportionate basis when the provisions to Rule 5 had been deleted with effect from 2.4.1987?" �The Tribunal is therefore, directed to furnish statement of case in respect of the aforesaid question. Rule is made absolute accordingly with no order as to costs. ---- */Mohandas
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan