Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.deepak Fertilizers
High Court
26 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.deepak Fertilizers
Date of order
26 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.deepak Fertilizers, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the reasons set out Income Tax, Income Tax Appeal No.238 of 2006 decided on 5th January, 2009. therein, there is no merit in this Appeal, which is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.84 of 2009
Commissioner of Income Tax. ..Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Deepak Fertilizers &
Petrochemicals Corpoation Ltd. Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta with Mr. P.S.Sahadevan, for the
Appellant.
Mr. B.V. Jhaveri, for the Respodnent.
CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATED: 26TH MARCH, 2009
CORAM: F.I.
R.S.MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: 26TH MARCH, 2009
P.C.:
P.C.:
. The substantial question of law as framed in
this Appeal is covered by the judgment of this Court
in Snowcem India Limited vs. Deputy Commissioner of
Snowcem India Limited vs. Deputy Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Income Tax Appeal No.238 of 2006 decidedon 5th January, 2009. For the reasons set out
Income Tax, Income Tax Appeal No.238 of 2006 decided
on 5th January, 2009.
therein, there is no merit in this Appeal, which is
accordingly dismissed.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue