In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.diana Watches And Ancillaries Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, appeals stand dismissed as barred by limitation, on the statement made by learned Counsel for the appellant.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2554 OF 2008WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2555 OF 2008WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2556 OF 2008
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.M/s.Dinar Diamonds Ltd.
WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2557 OF 2008
..Appellant
..Respondent
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.
M/s.Diana Watches and Ancillaries Pvt. Ltd.
..Appellant..Respondent
WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2558 OF 2008
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.M/s.Hill Properties Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2559 OF 2008
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.M/s.South India Shipping Corporation Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant in all matters.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATE : 1ST JULY, 2009
P.C.
Delay in filing the above appeals is ranging from 958 to 1618 days.
Learned Counsel for the appellant admits that no Notice of Motion has been taken out for condonation of delay in any of the above appeals. In this view of the matter, appeals stand dismissed as barred by limitation, on the statement made by learned Counsel for the appellant.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.