In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S.dynamix Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1887 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.511 OF 2007
Commissioner of Income-tax- ..Appellant
Versus
M/s.Dynamix Pvt. Ltd., ..Respondent
----
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
Mr.S.J.Mehta for the respondent.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello &
R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 20.02.2008
PC
1. This is a motion for condoning 847 days delay in
filing of the main appeal. On perusal of the
affidavit-in-support, we find that the CCIT had
granted approval for filing the appeal on 30.8.2004
and thereafter papers were sent to Ministry of Law
for drafting appeal memo. It appears from the
record that the appeal ultimately came to be lodged
in this Court on 2.3.2007. No dates have been given
in respect of events which occurred between
30.8.2004 and 2.3.2007. In our view, cause shown
does not amount to sufficient cause. Hence motion
dismissed.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.511 OF 2007
. As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed,
appeal also stands dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue