Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.kankha...

Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.kankhal Investments & Trading Co.pvt.ltd

High Court 17 Sep 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

17 Sep 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.kankhal Investments & Trading Co.pvt.ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.456 OF 2004 Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s.Kankhal Investments & Trading Co.Pvt.Ltd. ..Appellant ..Respondent None for appellant. Mr.J.D.Mistry with Mr.Raj Darak for respondent. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 17TH SEPTEMBER, 2009 DATE : P.C. None present for the appellant. Appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.