Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.kgk Jewellery Pvt. Ltd
High Court
09 Feb 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.kgk Jewellery Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
09 Feb 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.kgk Jewellery Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1377 of 2008
Commissioner of Income Tax.....Appellant
Vs.
M/s.KGK Jewellery Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant
Mr. Jitendra Jain i/b. RMG Law Associates for
the Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.
R.S.MOHITE, JJ.
R.S.MOHITE, JJ.
R.S.MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: 9th February, 2009
DATED: 9th February, 2009
P.C.:
P.C.:
. The Revenue is in Appeal against the order
of I.T.A.T., which confirmed the order of C.I.T.
(Appeal). The only contention advanced on behalf of
the Revenue is that the A.O. had examined the
transaction between M/s.Unique Diamonds and
M/s.Essar Enterprises and had found that the
transaction not to be genuine. Both C.I.T. and
I.T.A.T. have recorded that so far as supply made
by M/s.Unique Diamonds to the appellant concerned
the same cannot be questioned. The assessee is
working in the SEEPZ area and has maintained the
books. In these circumstances even if there be some
doubt as to genuiness of the transaction between
Essar Enterprises on one hand and Unique Diamonds on
the other the transaction between Unique Diamonds
and the assessee has not been doubted by the A.O.
In the light of the above, in our opinion, the
question of law as framed would not arise.
Consequently, Appeal dismissed.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.