Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.kiran...

Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.kiran A. Mehta

High Court 29 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.kiran A. Mehta
Date of order
29 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.kiran A. Mehta, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2752 of 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1414 of 2006 Commissioner of Income Tax...Appellant Vs. M/s.Kiran A. Mehta...........Respondent Mr. A.D. Kango with Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for Appellant CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 29TH JANUARY 2008 R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED: 29TH JANUARY 2008 P.C.: P.C.: . There is a delay of 588 days in preferring the Appeal. The last date for preferring the Appeal was 20th December, 2004. The same was filed on 1st August, 2006. The file was sent to Law Ministry on 17th December, 2004. The same was returned on 13th December, 2005. There is no explanation for the delay of nearly one year. Considering the same in our opinion the cause shown would not amount to sufficient cause and consequently Motion dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan