In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.lawkim Limited, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.In view of the dismissal of the Notice of Motion, the above Appeal also stands dismissed in default.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.977 OF 2004ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.291 OF 2004
Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.
M/s.Lawkim Limited
..Appellant
..Respondent
None for the Appellant.Ms.Rupali Dixit i/b.Maneksha & Sethna for theRespondent.
P.C.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.DATE : 29TH JUNE, 2007
earlier date and there is also a gross delay of 395
days. Hence, the Notice of Motion stands dismissed.
2.In view of the dismissal of the Notice of
Motion, the above Appeal also stands dismissed in
default.
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue