Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S.pams I...

Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S.pams Investment & Trading Co.p.ltd

High Court 20 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

20 Feb 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S.pams Investment & Trading Co.p.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1985 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.553 OF 2007 Commissioner of Income-tax- ..Appellant Versus M/s.Pams Investment & Trading Co.P.Ltd..Respondent ---- Mr.Vimal Gupta & Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant Mr.J.D.Mistry with Raj Darak for respondent. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 20.02.2008 PC 1. This is a motion for condoning 376 days delay in filing of the main appeal. On perusal of the affidavit-in-support, we find that the file was sent to the Panel Counsel for preparing draft on 22.2.2006 and the appeal was filed on 7.3.2007. No dates have been given in respect of the events which occurred between 22.2.2006 and 7.3.2007. In our view, cause shown does not amount to sufficient cause. Hence motion dismissed. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.553 OF 2007 . As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.