In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.percept Advertising Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.726 OF 2009
Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.
M/s.Percept Advertising Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.Suresh Kumar for appellant.
Mr.Jitendra Jain a/w.Damodar i/b.Kanga & Co. for respondent.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 28TH JULY, 2009
DATE :
P.C.
Learned Counsel for the appellant fairly states that the issue involved in the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Wealth Tax Vs. HUF of H.H.Late J.M.Scindia [2008] 300 ITR 193(Bom). In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law is involved in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue