Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S.raj Pi...

Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S.raj Pipes Ltd

High Court 20 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

20 Feb 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S.raj Pipes Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.427 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.202 OF 2007 Commissioner of Income-tax- ..Appellant Versus M/s.Raj Pipes Ltd., ..Respondent ---- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 20.02.2008 PC 1. This is a motion for condoning 1560 days delay in filing of the main appeal. On perusal of the affidavit-in-support, we find that approval for filing appeal was granted on 19.8.2002 and thereafter matter was sent for drafting to the Panel Advocate. The draft was however, received on 27.10.2006. A period of more than 4 years and 1 month for drafting appeal memo cannot be said to be reasonable. In our view, cause shown does not amount to sufficient cause. Hence motion dismissed. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.202 OF 2007 . As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.