Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S.shrust...

Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S.shrusti Trading Pvt. Ltd

High Court 20 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

20 Feb 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S.shrusti Trading Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2846 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.872 OF 2007 Commissioner of Income-tax- ..Appellant Versus M/s.Shrusti Trading Pvt. Ltd., ..Respondent ---- Vimal Gupta & P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 20.02.2008 PC 1. This is a motion for condoning 375 days delay in filing of the main appeal. On perusal of the affidavit-in-support, we find that the CCIT approved the filing of the appeal on 17.3.2006. Thereafter the matter was sent for drafting. Draft was received back on 19.2.2007. A period of over 10 months for drafting appeal memo cannot be said to be reasonable. In our view, therefore, cause shown does not amount to sufficient cause. Hence motion dismissed. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.872 OF 2007 . As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.