In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.solar Packaging Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, all the above appeals stand dismissed for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1292 OF 2005WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1293 OF 2005WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2115 OF 2009
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.
M/s.Solar Packaging Pvt.Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.D.A.Athavale for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 10[th] NOVEMBER,2009
DATE :
P.C.
Heard.
Learned Counsel for the appellant fairly state that the issue sought to be raised in the above appeals is squarely covered by the Apex Court judgment in the case of UCO Bank Vs. CIT 237 ITR 889. In this view of the matter, all the above appeals stand dismissed for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue