Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S.trinit...

Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S.trinity Engineers Ltd

High Court 20 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S.trinity Engineers Ltd
Date of order
20 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S.trinity Engineers Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.424 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.201 OF 2007 Commissioner of Income-tax- ..Appellant Versus M/s.Trinity Engineers Ltd., ..Respondent ---- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 20.02.2008 PC 1. This is a motion for condoning 1247 days delay in filing of the main appeal. A perusal of the affidavit-in-support indicates that CCIT-2 approved filing of appeal on 22.8.2002 and thereafter, file was sent to Panel Advocate for drafting appeal memo. The appeal memo was ultimately received back on was sent to Panel Advocate for drafting appeal memo. The appeal memo was ultimately received back on 27.10.2006. A period of more than 4 years and 2 months for drafting appeal memo cannot be said to be reasonable. In our view, cause shown does not amount to sufficient cause. Hence motion dismissed. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.201 OF 2007 . As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan