In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S.trinity Engineers Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.424 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.201 OF 2007
Commissioner of Income-tax- ..Appellant
Versus
M/s.Trinity Engineers Ltd., ..Respondent
----
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello &
R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 20.02.2008
PC
1. This is a motion for condoning 1247 days delay
in filing of the main appeal. A perusal of the
affidavit-in-support indicates that CCIT-2 approved
filing of appeal on 22.8.2002 and thereafter, file was sent to Panel Advocate for drafting appeal memo. The appeal memo was ultimately received back on
was sent to Panel Advocate for drafting appeal memo. The appeal memo was ultimately received back on 27.10.2006. A period of more than 4 years and 2
months for drafting appeal memo cannot be said to be
reasonable. In our view, cause shown does not
amount to sufficient cause. Hence motion dismissed.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.201 OF 2007
. As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed,
appeal also stands dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.