Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.uniche...

Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.unichem Laboratories Ltd

High Court 20 Mar 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.unichem Laboratories Ltd
Date of order
20 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.unichem Laboratories Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Decision: In view thereof, we dismiss the aboveApplication.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.66 OF 2002 Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s.Unichem Laboratories Ltd. ..Applicant ..Respondent Mr.B.M.Chatterjee with Ms.P.P.Bhosale for theApplicant.Mr.A.K.Jasani i/b.Ashok Bhogani & Co. for theRespondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.DATE : 20TH MARCH, 2007P.C.1.Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.The learned Counsel for the Respondent pointed outthat the tax effect is only Rs.3,33,000/- in theabove. In view of the circular dated 24thOctober,2005 issued by the Government of India,Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, CBDT,wherein it is clearly stated that an Appeal underSection 260A not to be entertained, if it is belowRs.4,00,000/-. The said circular is binding on the Revenue. In view thereof, we dismiss the aboveApplication. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan