In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.varun Shipping Co.ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, the present appeal also stands dismissed for the reasons recorded in the aforesaid order dated 22[nd] September, 2008.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2034 OF 2009
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.
M/s.Varun Shipping Co.Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Ms.Suchitra Kamble for appellant.
Mr.Jitendra Jain i/b. PDS Legal for respondent.
P.C.
1.Heard.Perused appeal.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 10[th] NOVEMBER,2009
DATE :
2.Learned Counsel for both the parties fairly state that the very same question was the subject matter of ITXA No.1040 of 2008 in the case of assessee itself, which was dismissed by an order dated 22[nd] September, 2008. In this view of the matter, the present appeal also stands dismissed for the reasons recorded in the aforesaid order dated 22[nd] September, 2008. No order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue