In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.venkatesh Premises Co.op.soceity Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, all the appeals stand dismissed in limine for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.(L)2553 OF 2009
Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.M/s.Venkatesh Premises Co.Op.Soceity Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.(L)2558 OF 2009WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.(L)2559 OF 2009WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.(L)2560 OF 2009WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.(L)2562 OF 2009
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.M/s.Mittal Court Premises Co.Op.Soceity Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.Suresh Kumar for appellant.
Mr.N.Thakker a/w. Rajesh Poojari i/b. Mint & Conferers for respondents.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 16[th] NOVEMBER, 2009
DATE :
P.C.
Heard.Perused appeals.
Learned Counsel for both the parties fairly state that the issue involved in the above appeals is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of MittalCourt Premises Co.Op. Society Ltd. (2009) 184 Taxman 292 (Bom.) against the Revenue. In this view of the matter, all the appeals stand dismissed in limine for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.