In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mukesh Singhvi, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.The appeals are disposed of as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 139/2014
Commissioner Of Income Tax
----Appellant
Versus
Mukesh Singhvi
----Respondent
Connected With
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 65/2012
C.i.t.central,jaipur
----Appellant
Versus
Mukesh Singhvi
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. K.K. BissaFor Respondent(s): Mr. Vineet Dave
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
07/08/2018
Order
1.Learned counsel for the appellant submits that as the taxeffect in the present appeals is less than Rs.50.00 lacs; in view of
the Circular dated 11.07.2018, he does not press it.
2.The appeals are disposed of as not pressed.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
(PRADEEP NANDRAJOG),CJ
Anurag/162-163
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue