Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax v. New Bharat...

Commissioner Of Income Tax v. New Bharat Engineering Works Ltd

High Court 20 Aug 2001 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. New Bharat Engineering Works Ltd
Date of order
20 Aug 2001
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. New Bharat Engineering Works Ltd, the High Court (2001) decided the matter.

Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus NEW BHARAT ENGINEERING WORKS LTD. -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 48 of 1987 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH Sd/- and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Sd/- ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus NEW BHARAT ENGINEERING WORKS LTD. -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 48 of 1987 MR BB NAYAK FOR MR MANISH R BHATT for Appellant. SERVED BY RPAD - (N) for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Date of decision: 28/08/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH) �The following question is referred to us by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench "B" for the assessment years 1976-77, 1979-80 and 1980-81 : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench "B" for "Whether, in law and on facts, the assessee is entitled to weighted deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act,1961 on expenditure by way of interest in respect of the period of credit granted to the foreign customers under the export contracts ?" 2.�Heard Mr.B.B.Nayak, learned Counsel for the Revenue. Though served, none appeared for the respondent. 3.�Our attention was drawn to the finding that the assessee had paid interest for the period of credit granted to foreign customers to the Gujarat Export Corporation Limited at Rs.30,209/-. The assessee claimed deduction under section 35B(1)(b) of the I.T.Act. Mr.Nayak submitted that in view of the decision of this Court in Testeels Ltd. vs. C.I.T. 205 I.T.R.230, the interest paid by the assessee to an institution within India would not be covered by sub clause (viii) and therefore it would not be eligible for weighted deduction. In view of the admitted fact that for the credit on the exported goods interest was paid to Gujarat Export Corporation Limited within India, having regard to the aforesaid decision of this Court, it will have to be held that the assessee was not entitled to weighted deduction under section 35B of the Act. An expenditure incurred by way of interest payment in India in respect deduction under section 35B of the Act. An expenditure incurred by way of interest payment in India in respect of the period of credit granted to the foreign customers against the export contract is not an expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively on performance of services outside India in connection with or incidental to the execution of such contract for supply outside India of any goods, facilities or services and hence such expenditure is not eligible for weighted deduction. We India of any goods, facilities or services and hence such expenditure is not eligible for weighted deduction. We accordingly answer the question in the negative i.e. in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. 4.�The Reference stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. ��Sd/-���Sd/- ��(M.S.Shah, J)� (D.A.Mehta, J) m.m.bhatt
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan