Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Nitiraj Pr...

Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Nitiraj Properties Pvt.ltd

High Court 12 Nov 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Nitiraj Properties Pvt.ltd
Date of order
12 Nov 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Nitiraj Properties Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Whether on the facts and the circumstancesof the case and in law the ITAT was justifiedin entertaining the miscellaneous applicationand in deleting the addition of Rs.3.32 croresmade under Section 69 of the Act?B.

Decision: Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.68 OF 2006 Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant Vs. Nitiraj Properties Pvt.Ltd...Respondent Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.Mr.R.Murlidhar a/w. Mr.Darshan Mehta i/b.DhruveLiladhar & Co. for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.DATE : 12TH NOVEMBER, 2008 P.C. .Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By way of the present Appeal, the Appellant is seeking toraise the following substantial questions of law: A. Whether on the facts and the circumstancesof the case and in law the ITAT was justifiedin entertaining the miscellaneous applicationand in deleting the addition of Rs.3.32 croresmade under Section 69 of the Act?B. Whether entertaining of the miscellaneousapplication amounts to review of an order notpermitted under the provisions of the Act andbeing beyond of the power of the ITAT underthe Act ?2.It is unfortunate that the Appellant has noteven bothered to annex the copy of the order passed in Miscellaneous Application, though both the questions of law arose out of the same. view thereof, we are not inclined to entertain the above Appeal. Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan