Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Patel Glas...

Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Patel Glass Corporation

High Court 13 Sep 2000 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Patel Glass Corporation
Date of order
13 Sep 2000
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Patel Glass Corporation, the High Court (2000) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: 271B read with sections 271 and 275 of the Income-tax Act, the following substantial question of law arises from the order of the Tribunal : "Whether the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in cancelling the penalty imposed by interpreting sec.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX APPLICATION No 1 of 2000 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE MR DM DHARMADHIKARI and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO 1 to 5� No -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXVersus PATEL GLASS CORPORATION -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : CHIEF JUSTICE MR DM DHARMADHIKARI and MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE Date of decision: 13/09/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT �On this application rule was issued. The respondent-assessee has been served. No one appears on its behalf. �After hearing the learned counsel for the department and examining the provisions of Sec. 271B read with sections 271 and 275 of the Income-tax Act, the following substantial question of law arises from the order of the Tribunal : "Whether the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in cancelling the penalty imposed by interpreting sec. 271B of the Act with the aid of sections 271 and 275 of the said Act and holding that penalty under sec. 271B can be imposed only by initiating proceedings in the course of assessment?" �The application is allowed and the Tribunal is directed to prepare a Statement of Case and refer the above question for decision of this Court. directed to prepare a Statement of Case and refer the �Rule is made absolute. ______ ���(D.M. Dharmadhikari, C.J.) ���(A.R. Dave, J.) (hn)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan