Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Power Build Pvt. Ltd
High Court
23 Dec 1998 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Power Build Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
23 Dec 1998
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Power Build Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (1998) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus POWER BUILD PVT.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 146 of 1984
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.BALIA. and
MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
--------------------------------------------------------------
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Versus
POWER BUILD PVT. LTD.
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner
SERVED BY RPAD - (N) for Respondent No. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.BALIA. and
MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
Date of decision: 23/12/98
ORAL JUDGEMENT
1.�At the instance of revenue following question of
law has been referred to this Court for its opinion arising out of order of the Tribunal in ITA 1390/Ahd/82 relating to assessment year 1978-79 in the case of
respondent assessee:
"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in allowing depreciation on drawings, patterns, etc. treating the same as plant under sub-section 93) of section 43 of the Income-tax Act, 1961?"
2.�It is candidly stated by learned counsel for the revenue that answer to the question is to be negatived in view of decisions of Supreme Court in CIT, Gujarat v. Elecon Engineering Co.Ltd.166 ITR 66 and in Scientific Engineering House P. Ltd. v. CIT, Andhra Pradesh 157
ITR 86.
3.�In view of the aforesaid, the question is answered in the affirmative, that is to say, against the revenue and in favour of the assessee. No one appeared on behalf of assessee.
�There shall be no orders as to costs.
�����(Rajesh Balia, J)
�����(A.R. Dave, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.