Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Pradeep J...

Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Pradeep J Kinariwala

High Court 17 Sep 2001 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Pradeep J Kinariwala
Date of order
17 Sep 2001
Assessment year(s)
1982-83, 1983-84
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Pradeep J Kinariwala, the High Court (2001) decided the matter.

Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO @ COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXVersus PRADEEP J KINARIWALA -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 122 of 1991 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO @ COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXVersus PRADEEP J KINARIWALA -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 122 of 1991 MR BB NAIK with MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner No. 1 NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Date of decision: 18/09/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH) �In this reference at the instance of the revenue, the following question is referred for the opinion of this Court in respect of assessment years 1982-83 and 1983-84 :- "Whether, the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in deleting the income of Rs.28,505/- for AY. 1982-83 (Rs.32899/- for A.Y. 1983-84) from the income of the assessee which was included under explanation 2A to section 64 (1) (iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ?" 2.�We have heard Mr. B.B. Naik learned counsel for the revenue. Though served none appears for the respondent-assessee.. 3.�Mr. Naik fairly points out that the controversy raised herein is concluded in favour of the assessee by the decision of this Court in CIT vs. Sunil J. Kinariwala 211 ITR 127. We accordingly answer the question in the affirmative i.e. in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. 4.�The Reference accordingly stands disposed of with no order as to costs. �����(M.S. Shah,J) �����(D.A. Mehta,J) zgs/-
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan