In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Pransukhlal & Sons Jewllers, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, appeal stands dismissed for want of substantial question of law.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1541 OF 2009
Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.Pransukhlal & Sons Jewllers
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.K.R.Choudhari for appellant.
Mr.R.Asokan for respondent.
P.C.
1.Heard.Perused appeal.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 14TH DECEMBER,2009
DATE :
2.The issue sought to be raised in the appeal revolves around appreciation of evidence. The Tribunal has appreciated the evidence in its right perspective with which no fault can be found. Considering the concurrent findings given by both the authorities below, we do not see any substantial question of law. In this view of the matter, appeal stands dismissed for want of substantial question of law.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue