Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Rajaram Bandekar Andsons (Shipping)Pvt.ltd. 1999 Itr 628 (S.c
High Court
23 Apr 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Rajaram Bandekar Andsons (Shipping)Pvt.ltd. 1999 Itr 628 (S.c
Date of order
23 Apr 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Rajaram Bandekar Andsons (Shipping)Pvt.ltd. 1999 Itr 628 (S.c, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Issue: Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal relying upon the decision of the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay in the case of Shri Chhatrapati S.S.K.Ltd (245 ITR 498) Shri Chhatrapati S.S.K.Ltd (245 ITR 498) was right in making addition made by the Assessing Officer...
Decision: We, therefore, dismiss the appeal with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAXAPPEAL NO.981 OF 2003.
INCOME TAX
Vithal Sahakari Sakhar ... Appellant.
V/s.
The Deputy Commissioner of
Income Tax (Spl.Range-3) ... Respondents.
and Ors.
Mr Bhushan Mahadik for the Appellant.
Mr Ashok Kotangale with P. S. Sahadevan for the
respondents.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN and V.C.DAGA, JJ.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
and V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATED : 23rd April 2007.
DATED : 23rd April 2007.
DATED : 23rd April 2007.
P.C. :
P.C. :----
----
1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. The learned counsel for the appellant pressing
only the following two questions of law;
1. Whether on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case and in law, the
Tribunal relying upon the decision of the
Hon’ble High Court of Bombay in the case of
Shri Chhatrapati S.S.K.Ltd (245 ITR 498)
Shri Chhatrapati S.S.K.Ltd (245 ITR 498) was
right in making addition made by the Assessing
Officer on account of interest on
non-refundable deposit collected by the
Assessee out of the sugarcane purchase price
payable to the cane growers as Trading
Receipts of the Assessee?
2. Whether on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case and in law, the
Tribunal was right in making addition of Rs.
26,882/-deleted by the Assessing Officer on
account of guest house expenses?
3. As far as the first question of law is
concerned, the learned counsel for the parties state
that the said question is squarely covered by the
judgment of the Supreme Court reported in the case of
Commissioner of Income-tax v. Rajaram Bandekar andSons (Shipping)Pvt.Ltd. 1999 ITR 628 (S.C.).
Commissioner of Income-tax v. Rajaram Bandekar and
Sons (Shipping)Pvt.Ltd. 1999 ITR 628 (S.C.)
4. Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances of
the case, we do not find any substantial question of
law involved in the appeal. We, therefore, dismiss
the appeal with no order as to costs.
(V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.