In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Raju Lalchand Sud, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.952 OF 2009
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.
Raju Lalchand Sud
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
P.C.
Heard.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 1ST JULY, 2009
DATE :
During the course of hearing, we were taken to the order of the Tribunal. After taking into account the factual aspects, no fault can be found with the view taken by the Tribunal. No substantial question of law is involved in the present appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue