Commissioner Of Income Tax v. R.r. Financial Consultants (P) Ltd
High Court
31 May 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. R.r. Financial Consultants (P) Ltd
Date of order
31 May 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. R.r. Financial Consultants (P) Ltd, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIR-215 + ITA 587/2004
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Rahul Chaudhary, Senior standing counsel with Mr. Anup Kumar Kesari, Advocate.
versus
R.R. FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS (P) LTD. ..... Respondent
CORAM:
JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
O R D E R% 31.05.2016
1. It appears that when this appeal was admitted on 24[th] September 2004 and the question of law was framed, no notice was issued to the Respondent/Assessee. Subsequently on 25[th] May 2007 notice was directed to be issued to the Respondent without process fee.
2. The office noting shows that for some time thereafter notice could not be issued to the Respondent for want of address. Thereafter in 2008 notice was received back unserved with the report that “the firm is found locked for the last two or three years.”
3. In the circumstances, the Court sees no useful purpose in keeping this appeal pending. The appeal is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution
with liberty to the Revenue to revive the appeal in case the present correct address of the Respondent/Assessee is able to be located.
S. MURALIDHAR, J
MAY 31, 2016/Rm
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.