Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax v. S P Jain &...

Commissioner Of Income Tax v. S P Jain & Company

High Court 07 Nov 2001 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. S P Jain & Company
Date of order
07 Nov 2001
Assessment year(s)
1984-85
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. S P Jain & Company, the High Court (2001) decided the matter.

Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus S P JAIN & COMPANY -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MH JOSHI FOR MR MANISH R BHATT for Applicant.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 200 of 1995 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH Sd/- and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Sd/- ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus S P JAIN & COMPANY -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MH JOSHI FOR MR MANISH R BHATT for Applicant. SERVED BY RPAD - (N) for Respondent. -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Date of decision: 07/11/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA) 1�The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has referred the following question for the opinion of this Court at the instance of the revenue, for assessment year 1984-85 : "Whether, the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in confirming the order made by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeal) deleting the addition of unpaid sales tax liability of Rs.97,536/- invoking the provisions of section 43B?" 2�We have heard Mr.M.H.Joshi, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the revenue. Though served none appears for the respondent-assessee. 3�Mr.Joshi fairly points out that the question stands answered by a decision of the Apex Court in the case of Allied Motors (P.) Ltd. vs. C.I.T., 224 I.T.R.677. Following the said decision, we answer the said question in the affirmative i.e. in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. 5�The reference stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. ����Sd/-��Sd/- ���(M.S.Shah,J)�(D.A.Mehta,J) m.m.bhatt
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan