Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sahyog Investments P. Ltd
High Court
05 Apr 2000 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sahyog Investments P. Ltd
Date of order
05 Apr 2000
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sahyog Investments P. Ltd, the High Court (2000) decided the matter.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus SAHYOG INVESTMENTS P.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
INCOME TAX APPLICATION No 384 of 1999
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO
-------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Versus
SAHYOG INVESTMENTS P. LTD.
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR BB NAIK for Applicant
MR RK PATEL for Respondent
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
and
MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
Date of decision: 05/04/2000
ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per A.R. Dave, J.)
�Heard learned advocate Shri BB Naik appearing for
the applicant and learned advocate Shri RK Patel appearing for the respondent-assessee.
�It has been submitted by the learned advocates
that similar questions had arisen before this Court in
Income Tax Application No. 17 of 1999 and after hearing
the concerned parties, this Court had reframed the
following two questions and had directed the Tribunal to
refer the said questions of law for the opinion of this
Court.
"1.�Whether in the facts and circumstances of
the case, the Appellate Tribunal is right in law
that the interest on debentures issued by
Companies other than local authority, Company or
Corporation established by a Central, State or
Provincial Act is not liable to be computed as
income under the head `interest on securities' ?
2.�Whether interest on debentures in all
circumstances is liable to be considered income
only when received by the assessee and not when
it became due ?"
�In the circumstances, we also hereby frame the
above referred two questions and allow the application
with a direction to the Tribunal to submit the statement
of facts and send the same for the opinion of this Court.
�The application stands disposed of accordingly.
Rule is made absolute with no order as to costs.
�����(A.R. Dave, J.)
April 5, 2000����(M.S. Shah, J.)
sundar/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.